Maldivian Democratic Party (MDP) has appealed to the High Court against a Civil Court decision to proceed with a defamation case filed by First Lady Sajida Mohamed.

The case involves allegations against the MDP, its chairperson Fayyaz Ismail, and party member Mariyam Zubair (Mandhy) related to comments made during a vape-ban protest in March.

The First Lady filed the case following remarks referencing her son, Umair Mohamed Muizzu, claiming the comments endangered his well-being and future. Mandhy is accused of violating laws protecting children's dignity and rights, including provisions under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. The MDP and Fayyaz are also being held accountable, as the comments were made at an official party event and through Fayyaz’s social media.

MDP argues that Sajida lacked the legal standing to file the complaint and that the Civil Court has no jurisdiction, citing procedural errors. However, Judge Faisal Adam ruled that Sajida has the right to approach the courts as a parent, and the Civil Court has jurisdiction under laws safeguarding children’s rights and reputations. The judge upheld the legitimacy of the case, allowing proceedings to continue. The High Court has yet to decide whether to admit the MDP’s appeal.